The Syrian tragedy grows
more ferocious by the week. I was shocked to learn this weekend that at least
2,000 Afghans, the poorest of the poor from the harshest country on earth – who
fled the Soviet invasion of their land and then the post-Russian civil war and
then the post-civil war Taliban and then the post-9/11 Taliban – are trapped in
basements in Damascus, unable to flee Syria or return to their forlorn land.
Theirs must be the most hideous nightmare, for most of them are Shia Muslims,
despised by the Taliban and now by the Sunni rebels trying to overthrow Bashar
al-Assad’s government.
Since Assad is an
Alawite, which is a form of Shiism, these Afghans are regarded as pro-regime by
the Syrian opposition and accused of siding with the government. At least 10,
I’m told, have been killed by car bombs and bullets. Most live around one
building and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees knows of them –
but when 10 families volunteered to leave two weeks ago and return to
Afghanistan, the UN told them it could not assist their passage or guarantee
their safety. Now this miserable community is appealing to the generosity of
Canada to help them.
“We are with neither side of the hostile
parties in Syria,” one of them has written from Damascus. “We came here to
solely survive the war which was going on in our native country.” Perhaps
Canada can save them. Certainly the rebels will not. Nor can I see the regime,
fighting its way across the ruins of Syria, caring for their lives now. The
Lebanese have now taken so many hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees, they
are unlikely to open their borders to Afghans. Do we care about them? Will Canada?
I cannot help but be astonished at the
vast population movements across the Middle East. In the 1970s and 1980s the
Afghans were pouring in their millions across the Pakistani and Iranian
borders. Tens of thousands of Lebanese regularly fled their civil war into
Syria. Then in 1990, tens of thousands of Kuwaitis fled across their border
from Saddam’s invasion – followed by a Biblical exodus of Kurds towards Turkey.
Then millions of Iraqis fled their homes after America’s 2003 invasion and
poured into Syria and Iran. And now the Syrians are living in the hundreds of
thousands in Lebanon: a quarter of Lebanon’s population. In some mountain
villages above Beirut, local authorities have even declared a curfew on the
streets for Syrians.
They now beg on almost every street in
the centre of the capital. Aggressive shoe-shine boys haunt the Corniche
outside my home. “From Syria,” one said to me at the weekend, pointing to his
filthy clothes and demanding money and pursuing me down the street, grabbing at
my shirt. Of course, I gave him money. Syrian women sit now at the street
corners, filthy children beside them, pleading for even a few Lebanese coins.
The Lebanese economy groans under the weight of the huge camps opened along the
border for the refugees. They are crossing now in vast numbers into northern
Iraq and a giant city-camp exists for them in Jordan.
And I find myself wondering what
catastrophic effect these mass migrations are having on the Middle East,
destroying whole societies, ripping up tribal and family identities, turning
the peoples of the Muslim (and Christian) world into huge armies of homeless
and broken people. What effect does this have on religion, on their faith?
Almost without recognizing it, we are faced with what must be the largest migration
of souls across frontiers since the refugee treks which followed the end of the
Second World War.
That conflict, too, was followed by
misery and hunger and disease. Unsurprisingly, polio has broken out in Syria
and 20 million children are to be vaccinated across the entire Middle East,
from Turkey down to Gaza and Egypt. But now Egypt is giving Syrian refugees a
rough time. Favoured byMohamed Morsi – before the army chucked him out –
Syrian refugees could access Egyptian healthcare and education. Morsi, of
course, supported the rebels in Syria and broke off relations with Assad – one
reason, perhaps, why the US smiled upon him – although the Americans may not
have noticed his relationship with the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.
But within days of the military coup in
Cairo the so-called “interim” government now in place brought immigration
restrictions back, and the Egyptian press, as lickspittle now as it was during
Mubarak’s heyday, began a campaign against both Palestinians and Syrian
refugees, claiming that the Syrians had supported Morsi. One media presenter,
as Cairo researcher Jasmin Fritzsche has pointed out, has even demanded that
Egyptians destroy the homes and shops of Syrians if they did not withdraw their
support from Morsi.
What is this vast brutalisation, the
streams of refugees over the past decades – and here we must remember the
750,000 Palestinians whose lands were taken by the new Israel more than 60
years ago and whose descendants live in the filth of camps to this day – going
to do to the region? They wash up in the seas off Australia or die in the
Mediterranean, or struggle across Turkey in the hope of reaching Europe. They
are people-smuggled, reduced to starvation, raped. What new harshness of spirit
will spring from all this torment? Sweden perhaps understands this with its
generosity towards the Syrians. Maybe Canada will help the Afghans of Damascus.
But I fear the world, scarcely blameless amid all this sorrow, will close its
borders tighter and blame the victims for their own desperation and throw at
them some cash – as I did last week scarcely a hundred metres from my Beirut
home – in the hope they will go away.
It’s a long way to defend Tipperary
Back to the Great War again. Not to
those wretched poppies –
which must now be tucked away until next year’s fashion show – but to a
wonderful little book on Ireland’s fine county of Tipperary during the 1914-18
conflict.
Tipperary was itself a garrison town,
and the wounded from the Somme – Britons, as well as Irishmen in British
uniform – arrived in their hundreds to remind the people of the island of the
cost of a hecatomb for which they – and they alone in the United Kingdom –
would not be conscripted.
But the British did their best to
persuade them to go to war.
My favourite line in this book by John
Dennehy – now a colleague on an Arab Gulf newspaper – recalls how The
Nationalist newspaper claimed that “Belgium’s soldiers were modern-day Spartans
fighting in Thermopylae and protecting Ireland from invasion”.
A pleasant myth for the pro-British
press to foist on the Irish, perhaps – but it would surely have mystified the
broken Belgian soldiery as they retreated into the beautiful but
soon-to-be-destroyed city of Ypres, the only bit of Belgium to remain in Allied
hands.
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.