Search For Keyword.

U.S. confirms ‘draft framework’ with Taliban

The U.S. and the Taliban have drafted the framework of a deal which could pave the way for peace talks with Kabul, special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad was quoted as saying Monday, but major sticking points including a cease-fire and a withdrawal of foreign forces remain. The comments by Khalilzad to the New York Times are the clearest signal yet from a U.S. official that talks between Washington and the militants are progressing, igniting hopes of a breakthrough in the grinding 17-year conflict.

Khalilzad has been leading a monthslong diplomatic push to convince the Taliban to negotiate with the Afghan government, but the militants have steadfastly refused, dismissing state authorities in Kabul as mere “puppets.”

The flurry of activity culminated in an unprecedented six straight days of talks in Qatar last week, with both the U.S. and the Taliban citing progress over the weekend.

“We have a draft of the framework that has to be fleshed out before it becomes an agreement,” Khalilzad, who arrived in Kabul Sunday to update Afghan authorities on the talks, was quoted as saying by the Times.

Experts quickly hailed the statement as a milestone, noting it indicated willingness on both sides to find a way out of the conflict.

However there is still no accord on a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal or a cease-fire - major sticking points on which previous attempts at talks have foundered in the past.

Saturday Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that without a withdrawal timetable, progress on other issues is “impossible.”

Khalilzad confirmed the Taliban had acceded on one major issue for the U.S.: safe havens.

“The Taliban have committed, to our satisfaction, to do what is necessary that would prevent Afghanistan from ever becoming a platform for international terrorist groups or individuals,” Khalilzad told the Times.

He gave no further details, but the statement gave weight to reports last week that the Taliban had agreed to oppose Al-Qaeda and Daesh (ISIS) in Afghanistan.

The U.S. invasion of 2001 was driven by the Taliban’s harboring of Al-Qaeda, but more than 17 years later the militant group appears diminished in the region.

Daesh, however, is a growing and potent presence in Afghanistan, where it is fighting a fierce turf war with the Taliban in some areas.

Analyst Michael Kugelman of the Wilson Center in Washington, D.C. said such a move had long been a major ask of the United States - but noted that it was more of a “conciliatory gesture” than a concession.

“The Taliban has never been a friend of ISIS, and Al-Qaeda has become a shadow of its former self,” he told AFP.

Even so “it signals, at least at this point, that the insurgents are willing to negotiate in good faith and agree to a key U.S. demand.”

Kugelman’s comments came as Afghan President Ashraf Ghani said the Taliban should “enter serious talks” with his government.

Afghan authorities have warned that any deal between the U.S. and the Taliban would require Kabul’s official endorsement.

“I call on the Taliban to ... show their Afghan will, and accept Afghans’ demand for peace, and enter serious talks with the Afghan government,” Ghani said in a televised address Monday.

U.S. President Donald Trump’s clear eagerness to end America’s longest war has also weighed heavy on the discussions, and Ghani warned against rushing into any sort of a deal, citing extreme violence in the aftermath of the Soviet withdrawal in 1989.

“We want peace, we want it fast but we want it with a plan,” the Afghan president continued.

Civilians continue to pay a terrible price for the Taliban insurgency, with some estimates showing the Afghan conflict overtook Syria to become the deadliest in the entire world in 2018.

Ghani’s office said Khalilzad had reassured the government that the negotiations in Qatar remain focused on bringing the insurgents to the table for talks with Kabul.

President Trump has said he wants to pull out half of the remaining 14,000 American troops, according to U.S. officials.

Kugelman said the process could yet collapse over a withdrawal.

“Who’s to say the Taliban won’t decide to seize on the resulting battlefield advantage and take up the fight anew?” he said.

The Taliban and U.S. officials have agreed to continue negotiations, though no date has been publicly announced.

AFP
(67)    (60)
Total Comments (0)

Comments About This Article

Please fill the fields below.
*code confirming note