In the world of theatre, where emotion and intellect collide, two pioneering thinkers have provided the most comprehensive map for understanding its magic. Eugenio Barba, the Italian maestro and founder of Odin Teatret, and Patrice Pavis, the French intellectual and critical theorist, represent two sides of the same coin. To follow only one is to see the stage with a single eye; to see through both is to gain profound, three-dimensional vision.
Barba: In the Laboratory of the Human Body
Imagine a scientist, not in a white coat, but in rehearsal clothes. Eugenio Barba's life's work has been a grand experiment centered on one question: What gives a performer that magnetic, electrifying presence that captivates an audience before they even speak a word?
Barba called this the search for the "pre-expressive" level. It's the foundation upon which all character and story are built. He observed that across cultures—from Balinese dancers to Italian commedia dell'arte actors—great performers share common principles in how they use their bodies. He termed this "Theatre Anthropology."
His core concepts are physical and universal:
The Dilated Body: The performer's body is not everyday; it is extra-daily, charged with energy and focus.
Balance in Opposition: Actors often use "sats" (a Norwegian word for readiness, like a cat about to pounce), creating dynamic tension by leaning one way while their energy is directed another.
The Economy of Action: Wasted movement is minimized; every gesture is precise and loaded with intention.
For Barba, the stage is built from the "cell"—the trained, vibrant body of the performer. His work is a gift to the actor, a manual for crafting the very instrument of their art.
Pavis: Mapping the Cultural Superstructure
If Barba is in the laboratory, Patrice Pavis is in the observation deck, telescope in hand. He is less concerned with the engine of the performance and more with its journey and destination. For Pavis, a play is not just a story; it is a complex cargo ship of cultural signs sailing from one port to another.
His primary interest is in "cultural transmission" or "interculturalism." He asks: What happens when this ship, loaded with the cultural goods of Japan, docks in the harbour of a European audience? How are its symbols—a specific mask, a ceremonial gesture, a musical tone—unloaded, translated, and understood?
His core concepts are analytical and contextual:
The Performance as a System: The actor is one sign among many: lighting, costume, set design, and sound all speak a language.
The Cross-Cultural Journey: Pavis developed models to track how meaning is inevitably lost, transformed, or created anew when art crosses borders—a process he called "the hourglass effect."
The Audience's Role: Meaning is not sent; it is received. The audience's cultural background is the final, and most important, co-author of the play.
For Pavis, the unit of analysis is the "ecosystem"—the entire performance as it exists within a specific cultural and social context.
The Synergy: Why We Need Both Lenses
To see these two men as rivals is to miss the point entirely. They are collaborators in a grand project to understand theatre in its totality.
Consider a modern director staging a classic Greek tragedy with influences from Indian Kathakali dance:
It starts with Barba. He trains his actors in the principles of extra-daily energy. They work on their "sats," their footwork, and the precise, muscular mudras (hand gestures) of Kathakali to find a powerful, pre-expressive physicality.
He then thinks with Pavis. How will a New York audience, unfamiliar with Kathakali, read these gestures? Will they see a king's rage, or just an exotic, confusing movement? She must now carefully frame these physical scores with set, sound, and perhaps program notes to guide the reception, navigating the cross-cultural passage that Pavis so brilliantly charted.
Barba provides the "how-to"—the techniques to build a vibrant, live performance. Pavis provides the "user's manual" for ensuring that this live wire of energy connects with an audience and communicates something specific and powerful, rather than short-circuiting in a cloud of misunderstanding.
Conclusion: A Unified Theory of Performance
In an increasingly globalized world where cultural exchange is the norm, the combined vision of Barba and Pavis is more relevant than ever. Barba reminds us of our shared human capacity for powerful expression—a common ground in the body itself. Pavis cautions us to respect difference, to navigate the complex tides of culture with intelligence and sensitivity.
Together, they form a unified theory for contemporary performance: Barba, the architect of the body, builds the house. Pavis, the cartographer of meaning, ensures it has an address and that everyone invited can find the door. For anyone who creates, studies, or simply loves the theatre, understanding this powerful duo is not just academic—it's essential to seeing the whole, magnificent picture.
Mohamed Hamdan is a Syrian researcher and playwright who focuses on social science and cultural studies, particularly performing arts.
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.