(Reuters) - When
Sunni rebels rose up against Syria's Bashar al-Assad in 2011, Turkey
reclassified its protégé as a pariah, expecting him to lose power within
months and join the autocrats of Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Yemen on the
scrap heap of the "Arab Spring". Assad, in contrast,
shielded diplomatically by Russia and with military and financial
support from Iran and its Shi’ite allies in Lebanon's Hezbollah, warned
that the fires of Syria’s sectarian war would burn its neighbors. For
Turkey, despite the confidence of Tayyip Erdogan, elected this summer
to the presidency after 11 years as prime minister and three straight
general election victories, Assad’s warning is starting to ring
uncomfortably true. Turkey’s
foreign policy is in ruins. Its once shining image as a Muslim
democracy and regional power in the NATO alliance and at the doors of
the European Union is badly tarnished. Amid
a backlash against political Islam across the region Erdogan is still
irritating his Arab neighbors by offering himself as a Sunni Islamist
champion. The world,
meanwhile, is transfixed by the desperate siege of Kobani, the Syrian
Kurdish town just over Turkey’s border, under attack by extremist Sunni
fighters of the Islamic State (IS) who are threatening to massacre its
defenders. Erdogan has
enraged Turkey’s own Kurdish minority – about a fifth of the population
and half of all Kurds across the region – by seeming to prefer that IS
jihadis extend their territorial gains in Syria and Iraq rather than
that Kurdish insurgents consolidate local power. The
forces holding on in Kobani are part of the Democratic Union Party
(PYD), closely allied to the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), which has
fought a 30-year war against the Turkish state and is now holding peace
talks with Ankara. BIG RISKS Meanwhile,
Turkish tanks stood idly by as the unequal fight raged between the PYD
and IS, while Erdogan said both groups were "terrorists" and Kobani
would soon fall. It was a public relations disaster. It
drew criticism from NATO allies in the US-led coalition, which has
bombed jihadi positions around the town in coordination with the PYD. It
also prompted Kurdish riots across south-east Turkey resulting in more
than 40 dead. At the same
time, Turkey's air force bombed PKK positions near the Iraqi border for
the first time in two years, calling into question the 2013 ceasefire
declared by Abdullah Ocalan, the jailed PKK leader. PKK commanders
warned that if Turkey let Kobani fall, they would go back to war. Yet
now that the United States has dropped arms to Kobani’s defenders,
Erdogan has been forced to relent and open a Turkish corridor for
Peshmerga fighters from Iraq to reinforce Kobani. Turkish
officials fear this will provoke reprisals in Turkey by IS, activating
networks it built during the two years the Erdogan government allowed
jihadi volunteers to cross its territory to fight in Syria. Almost
anything Turkey does now comes with big risks. POLARIZED NATION The
polarization within Turkey along sectarian and ethnic lines - which
analysts say Erdogan has courted with his stridently Sunni tone as
communal conflict between Sunni and Shi'ite rages to Turkey’s south - is
easy to detect in the poor and deeply conservative district of Fatih in
Istanbul. “I prefer to
have IS than PKK in control of Kobani,” says Sitki, a shopkeeper. “They
are Muslims and we are Muslims. (But) we as Muslims should be ruled by
the Koran under Sharia law." Another local shopkeeper, Nurullah, 35, broadly agreed: “The
only mistake the government has made is to open the door to Kurdish
refugees. PYD and PKK are the same, both terrorists. How do (the
Americans) have the nerve to ask us to help PYD?” “Of course Islamic State has sympathizers here because they are wiping out the PKK,” Nurullah continued. Nearby,
a bearded Arabic-speaking man who declined to be named said it made
sense that “Turkey as a Sunni nation supports IS over the crusaders”, a
hostile reference to the US-led coalition against IS of which Turkey
looks an unwilling party. ZERO NEIGHBORS The
increasingly overt Sunni alignment of Erdogan’s Turkey is,
paradoxically, contributing to its isolation, at a time when the United
States has won the support of the Sunni Arab powers, led by Saudi
Arabia, in the campaign against IS. Partly,
that is because Erdogan and his new prime minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who
as foreign minister was the architect of Turkey’s eastward turn away
from the EU, continue to champion the pan-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood,
ousted in Egypt last year and banned across the Gulf. But
it is also because of Ankara’s ambivalence towards IS, which some in
Turkey’s government saw as a bulwark against its three main regional
adversaries: the Assad regime, the Shi'ite-led government in Iraq, and
the Kurds. “Their policy is making Turkey look completely isolated”, says Hugh Pope of the International Crisis Group. Yet
there is a wide consensus that Erdogan and his Islamist Justice and
Development Party (AKP) tried and failed to take a leadership role as
the turmoil of the Arab Spring swept across the region and have ended up
by infecting Turkey’s secular republic with the sectarianism plaguing
the Levant. "From a zero
problems policy (with neighbors) to zero neighbors,” said a headline in
the leftist Evrensel newspaper in reference to the AKP policy of entente
with neighboring states. IS FIGHTING TURKEY'S ENEMIES Behlul
Ozkan, a political scientist at Istanbul’s Marmara University, says the
Erdogan government has supported Islamist movements in the Middle East
to establish a sphere of influence and play a leadership role. “When
the Arab Spring started, Davutoglu saw it as an opportunity for his
imperial fantasy of establishing the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) belt
from Tunisia to Gaza. "They
are obsessed with destroying the Assad regime. They see IS as an
opportunity for Turkey since it is fighting its enemies on three fronts:
against Baghdad’s Shi’ite-dominated leadership, against Assad, and the
PYD, which is an affiliate of the PKK.” Soli
Ozel, a prominent academic and commentator, said the Erdogan
government's initial expectation was that the Muslim Brotherhood would
come to power in Syria. “Turkish
officials believed a year and a half ago they could control the jihadis
but they played with fire. This was a policy of sectarianism and they
got into something ... they couldn’t control, and that is why we are
here”. Other commentators
and Turkish officials say Western and Arab powers that called for Assad
to be toppled but refused to give mainstream Syrian rebels the weapons
to do it are to blame for the rise of Jihadis in the resulting vacuum. “They
(Turkish officials) bet on Assad to fall and when they lost, instead of
backing off they are doubling down,” says Hakan Altinay of the
Brookings Institution. “They are not the only culprits. The
international community is also a culprit in this affair”. CAUGHT BETWEEN TWO FIRES But
uppermost among Ankara’s fears is the prospect that Syrian Kurds led by
the PYD -- newly legitimized by their alliance with the United States
-- will establish a new Kurdish entity on Turkey’s frontiers, which will
incite Turkey's Kurds to seek self government. “In
the realpolitik of all this, IS is fighting all the enemies of Turkey
-- the Assad regime, Iraqi Shi'ites and the Kurds -- but the spillover
effect is that it is now paying the price in terms of its vulnerability
on the Kurdish question,” says Kadri Gursel, a prominent liberal
columnist. Cengiz Candar,
veteran columnist and expert on the Kurdish issue adds: “If Syrian
Kurds are successful and establish self-rule they will set a precedent
and a model for Turkey’s Kurds, and more than 50 percent of Kurds in the
world live here”. Turkey
is thus caught between two fires: the possibility of the PKK-led
Kurdish insurgency inside Turkey reviving because of Ankara’s policy
towards the Syrian Kurds; and the risk that a more robust policy against
IS will provoke reprisal attacks that could be damage its economy and
the tourist industry that provides Turkey with around a tenth of its
income. Internationally,
one veteran Turkish diplomat fears, IS “is acting as a catalyst
legitimizing support for an independent Kurdish state not just in Syria
but in Turkey” at a time when leading powers have started to question
Turkey’s ideological and security affiliations with the West.
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.