(Reuters) - As winter sets in along the front lines of Aleppo, residents are desperate for the sort of relief United Nations officials hope a new ceasefire push will soon bring to the war-battered Syrian city. The plan, led by the U.N. peace envoy to Syria,
Staffan de Mistura, would set up local truces in so-called "freeze
zones" to stop fighting and allow aid into rebel districts. Residents
could certainly use the help. But after nearly four years of conflict
and countless failed peace plans, civilians and fighters alike are
skeptical. The initiative
is risky for the disparate opposition groups and while the government
has stated its interest, diplomats and analysts doubt its sincerity and
say Aleppo could face the same fate as the central city of Homs, where
government forces have largely regained control. "We
cannot trust any initiative," said Safi al-Masri, a 25-year-old Aleppo
resident. "We consider this initiative far from humanitarian after all
the Syrian blood that's been spilled." While
other residents and fighters interviewed by Reuters were less
categorical in their doubt, saying they would welcome any plan that
relieved the city's suffering, most questioned whether it would come to
anything. One reason is
that too much rides on the battle for Aleppo for both sides. While
rebels once believed taking the city -- formerly Syria's commercial hub
-- would strike a death blow to President Bashar al-Assad's government,
many now fear the opposite: If Assad's forces push rebels from the city
it could devastate the rebellion in the north. Rebels,
including some from al Qaeda's Syrian affiliate, the Nusra Front, have
clung to territory north of Aleppo, keeping lines open between the
city's rebel-held eastern districts and maintaining links to the Turkish
border. They have been
able to do so, rebels say, partly because of deals that have prevented
the infighting that hobbled them elsewhere, as well as incremental
increases in military aid from states opposed to Assad. "The
situation ... has been stable since the fighting factions started
coordinating to face the regime on this front and support was directed
from the factions specifically to this front," said a 20-year-old rebel
who gave his name as Abu Abbas. A DIRE SITUATION In
much of Aleppo, however, there is little left to save. Rebel districts
have been devastated by months of government bombardment with "barrel
bombs," explosives packed with shrapnel and nails. Residents say those attacks have eased in recent weeks, but it is unclear why, and hardly anyone expects the lull to last. "Now
it's winter and there are no barrel bombs, so we've started to work,
but tomorrow when summer comes and the barrel bombs return, we'll go
back to being displaced," said Mohammad Helwani, member of a local
council in Aleppo. De
Mistura has taken a different approach to easing this type of suffering
than his two predecessors, who quit in frustration after failing to
bring the warring sides anywhere close to a deal. The envoy has said the proposed "freeze zones" are intended to deliver something tangible to Syrians. The
Syrian government has voiced guarded support for the plan. Assad said
it was "worth studying" and Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem said after
meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin this week that they agreed on
the need to support the initiative. Yet
many question whether either side will accept a deal. Before de
Mistura's visit to Damascus this month, diplomats said government forces
could use ceasefires to force surrenders and round up local men as they
have in the past. Noah Bonsey, senior analyst on Syria
at the International Crisis Group, said rebels would be unlikely to
agree any deal that was unpopular with their supporters while the
government likely saw the status quo working in its favor. "In
general, the regime agrees to ceasefires to cement a military victory
or to enable the movement of supplies or redeployment of forces
elsewhere," he said. Another complicating factor in any ceasefire talks is the prominence of the Nusra Front. Assuming
the group would agree to talk, it is blacklisted as a terrorist group
by the U.N. Security Council, putting it off-limits for political
negotiations, although humanitarian law allows contacts with such groups
to secure goals such as a ceasefire. A
spokeswoman for de Mistura declined to comment on who might be involved
in any Aleppo ceasefire talks. “At the moment we are doing a mapping of
influences on the ground in Aleppo, and that will help us in the
implementation of the plan,” she said. And
while Nusra Front has fought alongside other rebels in Aleppo, the
group has become suspicious of Western-backed groups since it was hit by
U.S. air strikes during the campaign against Islamic State.
In Syria, desperate residents see little hope in U.N. Aleppo truce plan
![](CustomImage/get/700/500/4ee7867a73a57d1f4023bcf8..jpg)
Reuters
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.