(Reuters) - Local
bankers are joining the fight against a congressional proposal to audit
the U.S. Federal Reserve's policy decisions, with more expected to
lobby against the bill if it gains traction in Washington. The audit the Fed
bill, championed by Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican Senator and
likely presidential candidate, would encourage interference from
lawmakers into the central bank’s monetary policy discussions. A similar
Fed audit bill passed the House of Representatives late last year and a
hearing on Fed transparency is expected to be formally called by the
Senate banking committee, according to people familiar with the matter. A
Reuters survey of 24 state banking groups has found that four are
actively opposed to Audit the Fed and five would probably take a stand
against the bill if it gains more support, giving the central bank an
influential ally as the Fed ramps up its own public opposition. The
support of groups like the Ohio Bankers League, which is sending 82
members to Washington this week with the bill on its agenda, shows that
even though banks of all sizes complain about restrictive Fed
regulations, they support its ability to independently set monetary
policy. "We feel the
current system works well, it's time-tested, and there are all kinds of
reasons why political influence at the Fed is a bad thing," said Bob
Lameier, president of the Ohio group and head of Miami Savings Bank in
Miamitown, near Cincinnati. In
the run-up to the 2010 Dodd-Frank legislation, community bankers
aligned with Fed officials to convince lawmakers not to strip the
central bank of responsibility for supervising small banks. The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was a group of
rules passed in 2010 in a bid to prevent the recurrence of events that
caused the 2008 financial crisis. There
are more than 6,000 community banks in the U.S., representing 93
percent of all lenders in the country, government data show. Community
banks, which typically have less than $10 billion in assets, account for
about 45 percent of all of the small loans to businesses and farms made
by insured institutions in the United States. The
sector is also an influential voice in Washington. The Independent
Community Bankers of America, their trade group, gave $1.3 million in
political contributions in the 2013-14 campaign cycle, according to the
Center For Responsive Politics. This
week, Fed Chair Janet Yellen will testify before the Senate Banking,
Housing and Urban Affairs Committee for the first time since Republicans
gained control of the Senate. Bankers and Fed officials alike say the
change of control increases the chance that Congress backs the Audit
bill and sends it to President Barack Obama. Committee
Chair Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican who opposed Yellen's
appointment, supports making the Fed more transparent but has not said
whether he backs a full audit. He is expected to call a committee
hearing on Fed transparency in the coming weeks, said a person familiar
with the matter. Shelby's office declined to comment. The
audit bill would allow legislators to launch investigations of Fed
policy decisions, which supporters say will shed more light on the
unelected body and its $4.5-trillion balance sheet. Last week, Sen. Paul
hosted a Facebook-based question-and-answer period on the bill that
drew more than 1,300 comments. The
Fed's finances, however, are already audited and the bank has taken
steps to lift the veil on its decisionmaking, including regularly
publishing economic and policy forecasts, and clarifying its long-term
goals. Fed policymakers have meanwhile amplified their criticism of the
bill, arguing it would encourage short-term political meddling and
imperil its independence. While
Obama would be expected to veto a Fed audit bill, the debate is set to
heat up along with the campaign for the 2016 presidential election. Audit
the Fed "is unnecessary and we do not support it," said Arizona Bankers
Association spokeswoman Theresa Kleinlein, adding it was not a high
priority because the group did not expect the bill to "move very far." The
Iowa Bankers Association was similarly opposed, while its Alabama
counterpart plans a thorough review of the bill and is prepared to
discuss it with lawmakers during a spring visit to the capital. The
group is "very supportive of transparency yet would be wary of efforts
to diminish the independence of the Fed or to politicize it in any way,"
said Scott Latham, president of the Alabama Bankers Association. Shelby represents Alabama while Sherrod Brown, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking committee, is from Ohio. The
Ohio bankers plan to meet this week with Brown, Republican House
Speaker John Boehner and other lawmakers to discuss the bill and other
issues such as bank regulations and cyber security. Brown opposes the
Fed audit bill. Banking
groups in Texas, Tennessee, Massachusetts, Virginia and Arkansas said
they were inclined to oppose the bill but were skeptical it would
progress in Congress. Still,
most of the state organizations contacted by Reuters were either
unaware of the bill or had not staked a position, a sign that the
banking industry, which sends more money to the Republican party, may be
cautious about a lightening-rod issue that can pit Main Street against
Wall Street. Through a
spokeswoman, Sen. Paul said the bill is about "restoring fiscal sanity
to our nation's checkbook," adding in an email he aims to put it to a
Senate vote. At an Iowa rally earlier this month, he told cheering
supporters: "Anyone here want to audit the Fed? Anybody hear that the
Fed's out to get us?"
Local bankers emerge as Fed ally in fight against audit bill
![](CustomImage/get/700/500/367776197109d341f5bdfba7.jpg)
Reuters
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.