(Reuters) - The
growing power of the ultra-hardline Islamic State means the Syrian army
is now having to confront a group it has until now been reluctant to
attack for political reasons. The emergence of the al Qaeda offshoot, formerly known as the Islamic State in Iraq
and the Levant (ISIL), has so far allowed President Bashar al-Assad to
present himself to the world as a bulwark against Sunni Islamist
radicals. At the same
time, the group's tendency to fight more moderate rebel forces also
helped to divide the opposition, making it easier for Assad's forces to
recapture territory lost in earlier periods of Syria's civil war. As
a result, some analysts suspect army commanders pursued a twin-track
strategy against ISIL - they have sought to reduce the group's threat to
the state, while ensuring it remains strong enough to continue feuding
with other rebels. Now that Islamic State's fighters have gained momentum in Syria, boosted by equipment seized in a rapid offensive next door in Iraq, the army may need to become more confrontational with the group if it wants to avoid losing territory to it. Last month Islamic State declared an "Islamic caliphate" in territory it controls in Iraq and Syria, and vowed to expand. It
has mainly advanced in Syria by capturing land from more moderate rebel
fighters. But it is now clashing with the Syrian military more often,
and the army has responded by stepping up aerial bombings on its
positions. In the short
term, Damascus has not been too worried about ISIL, said a former Syrian
diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity. "In
the long-term though, it must be a matter of great concern because it
makes it all the more difficult should ISIL establish itself
semi-permanently, especially with its control of resources like the
oil." "There is a conflict
of interests here between what is short-term and practical, and a
long-term consideration," the former diplomat said. GAS FIELD ATTACK Last
week, Islamic State killed 270 soldiers, guards and staff when it
captured a gas field in central Syria, in the deadliest clash yet
between the group and government forces, according to the Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights, a group based in Britain which tracks the
violence. Syrian newspaper al-Watan, citing sources, said that around 60 members of the security forces were killed. Syrian
soldiers also fought Islamic State militants outside a
government-controlled army airport in the east of the country last
Friday, part of a major escalation of hostilities between the two
groups. The airport is
one of the last major strategic locations in Deir al-Zor province which
is not under the control of the Islamic State, and its capture would
deny the Syrian army of its launch pad for air strikes on the east of
the country. If the Syrian
government wants to take back control of territory in the north and
east of the country, it will have to confront the Islamic State,
observers say. Made up of a
few thousand fighters of various nationalities, the Islamic State
lacks the firepower of the Syrian army. But it has been among the
strongest of the armed groups, despite having little presence in Syria
until two years ago. Its
fighters have also used non-military methods to make gains, such as
encouraging ad hoc alliances, exploiting local grievances and buying off
opposition fighters. Anti-Assad
activists and Western officials say the government has allowed Islamic
State forces to flourish while attacking less extreme rebels. Assad has used the group's rise to back his argument that Syria faces a militant Islamist threat, diplomats say. "The
government wants (Islamic State) to be strong enough for its propaganda
purposes and is therefore hesitant to attack it," one Western diplomat
said, adding that any government offensives were launched because Assad
needed to be seen as acting against the group. Although
government forces have avoided attacking the group's convoys and
confronting it on the ground unless it is necessary, that does not mean
it has been ignored as an enemy, the Observatory's director Rami
Abdurrahman said. "Since
June 10 until now, there have been air strikes on (Islamic State) areas
every day," he said, adding that before then it was once every four to
five days. "When it
becomes stronger, it is a danger for the Syrian regime. Where it is a
little bit weaker and fights with other rebel fighters, it is good for
the Syrian regime to have a rest and control the area," he said. FLASHPOINTS He
said potential flashpoints between the army and Islamic State include
Deir al-Zor province, areas around Raqqa city in central Syria, Aleppo
in the northwest and eastern parts of the Hama province. The
Observatory, which relies on a network of contacts on the ground in
Syria, estimates that Islamic State controls at least 35 percent of the
country's territory. Some insist Assad sees Islamic State purely as a foe. Salem
Zahran, a Lebanese analyst who is sympathetic to Assad and meets Syrian
officials regularly, says Damascus views Islamic State as a threat like
all Syria's other armed groups. "The
Syrian leadership ... does not differentiate (Islamic State) from the
rest of the factions, and there is a danger from any faction that takes
up arms," he said. Islamic
State is seen by Damascus as a danger on the ground even if it has
helped to serve political objectives, said Jihad Makdissi, a former
Syrian foreign ministry official who left the country and is now an
independent political figure who backs the Geneva peace process for
Syria. "They see it
absolutely as a threat to the country from a security and military stand
point and they are already fighting them in many places according to
the government's priorities." But
from a political perspective, Islamic State has served the Syrian
government's objectives by demoralizing and demonising the opposition,
he added.
Rise of Islamic State tests Syrian army strategy
![](CustomImage/get/700/500/cef70d758905aa17d0f78e4e.jpeg)
Reuters
Comments About This Article
Please fill the fields below.